Sunday, January 6, 2008

Retirement Planning and Indecision

Nothing is more devastating to a retirement plan than indecision. How you make the right one is open to discussion and has been a subject of great thinkers throughout the centuries as they struggle with various strategies. Herodotus wrote the following passage in 450 B.C.:

    "If an important decision is to be made [the Persians] discuss the question when they are drunk and the following day the master of the house...submits their decision for reconsideration when they are sober. If they still approve it, it is adopted; if not, it is abandoned. Conversely, any decision they make when they are sober is reconsidered afterwards when they are drunk." – from The Histories


I mention Jacob Freifeld in the book and will examine a quote I used from a paper he wrote in 1996 titled “Speculative Bubbles: Financial Genius before the Fall”. In my next entry, I will discuss this paper in depth but before I do, I want to take a look at the psychological aspect on indecision.



We all can be indecisive on one level or another. When it comes to retirement planning, the effects of those lack of concrete decisions can have long term ramifications on your future. Our day-to-day life is filled with these human foibles. To that end, I want you to ask yourself: “How many times have you employed one or more of the strategies below?”

Turning to outside sources – well outside what would be considered normal advice: Astrology palm readings, Feng Shui, numerology, fortune-tellers all fit this category and as odd as they may sound to many, once you feel the gripe of indecision, your are more likely to embrace more non-conventional methods. How the stars align themselves at your birth has little to do with which road to take in retirement planning.




Trusting in Fate: Once you believe that control of the situation is out of your hands, we allow fear of making a decision to you’re your future landscape. Doing this is tantamount to giving up. Hope does not have a twin in fate.

Ignoring the problem – often before it is a problem: This is the faith-based approach. While waiting for a miracle might seem like a good idea, the chances are slim to none that your financial future will have such a glorious or divine intervention. Someone once said that this is a little like “Jumping off a cliff while building your wings on the way down.”

Same day decision-making: As you go through life, you gather information. This is a continual process that involves a sort of evolution in thinking. The book provides you with numerous events that could change the course of your plan and solutions on how to absorb those changes in your future. In order to make a good decision, you need all of the information at your fingertips.



The Commitment to the Plan: No business that hopes to survive will keep doing the same thing over and over again if it does not seem to be working. Yet, we will look at our “investment” in time and effort as a reason not to turn change course.

Looking backwards: While the past is often discounted as something the already happened, mistakes that already were made, it is important to see where you have been in order to see where the next step might lead you. Good decisions take reflection on not only strategy, but also whether the strategy is still worth pursuing.

Prejudice: We tend to look for answers we expect and disregard those that do not support a pre-selected idea. This is a brain squabble that has no place in retirement planning. You can seek out information to support your idea but you also need to look for arguments against it.




Praying for a miracle: While prayer has its place in our lives, trusting our retirement plan to miracles is not a good choice.
The worse things get,
the harder people pray,
the worse things get.





Unbridled Optimism and Prudence: Henri Poincare said, "Doubt everything or believe everything: these are two equally convenient strategies. With either, we dispense with the need to think for ourselves." Those same doubts betray us, freeze us in mid-decision and that is the most crippling form of contagion. While caution is wise, too much of it can be habit-forming and that can put a retirement plan in a position where it is least likely to recover.

Pass the buck: In-decision makers are most likely to have someone to blame rather than a mentor who helps the make the decision by weighing the pros and cons. This is not a healthy conclusion for either party. Your future is your responsibility and the decisions you make (or don’t) are yours alone. While seeking someone to blame is human nature, it is corrosive when it comes to retirement planning.
Second-guessing your thoughts: Having a back-up plan is one thing – that can be called diversification – but second-guessing every decision before you make will leave exactly where you began.

Wrong first: Even if you have made numerous financial mistakes, all of them can be fixed. But not if you believe that trying something new is pre-destined to fail. Believing you will fail before you try is something that happens with the greatest of ease. thought.

Defining the problem: You need to believe this once concept. If you know the problem then, your solution might be good.

Common Sense should rule: The most indecisive people are those who are continually looking for something to argue with their gut feeling. When you are thinking for yourself you are entertaining what would appear at first glance to be unconventional. But common sense investing almost always demands you make some uncommon choices.




Understanding the problem: Investing is not easy. It relies on due diligence and education. If you put in the time you will subjectivity, irrational analysis, lateness or procrastination, lack of sensitivity, and lack of focus. No investment issue is too complex as long as you avoid boutique type investment strategies. Stick to those mentioned in the book and look to form your own comfort zone around those principles.

Analogies, Information, and Lack of Alternatives: Analogies are not made for proof. Not all information gathered is valid. And being backed into a corner from which there is no escape except to accept the alternative is not an option. The decision maker needs to be comfortable with their choices, which might fly in the face of some popular notions. Someone once wrote that it is not important what Wall Street says; it is important to do what Wall Street does.



Cognitive dissonance: This happens when you finally make the decision against the options you favored for the alternatives. Don’t be fooled by the first decision is the best decision strategy. Your financial future is a fluid place with numerous options that will change over time. Always review all possibilities and change the plan’s course if there are better options – ones you may have discounted.

Friday, January 4, 2008

Retirement Planning and Employee Stress

Along the same topic of stress, there is a mention in the book about financial education for employees. Some business leaders suggest that once employees grasp some basic financial ideas, those ideas become tools to eliminate stress and increase productivity.

"Our calls in general for mortgage-related issues are up over three times compared to last year," says Richard Chaifetz, CEO of ComPsych. "(Employees) become preoccupied with financial issues at work. You see absenteeism, lack of performance and turnover as people look for jobs that may pay more." ComPsych, for those interested is focused the business aspect of the equation and offers products and services to that end.

The not-for-profit company Personal Finance Employees Education Foundation, inc. led by the renowned Dr. E. Thomas Garmin, works to achieve three goals: (1) The lack of financial literacy--spending plans, credit management, and savings--is the major reason why employees do not save for retirement; (2) Money worries hinder employee job performance; and (3) Providing employees easy access to basic financial literacy education programs improves their personal financial behaviors and job performance as well as the employer's bottom line.



These folks act as an intermediary advisors, taking donations for its efforts with a volunteer board and recommending programs designed to further the education process. Those donations can run from as little as $500 to $100,000.

According to Dr. Thomas R. Watson, a leading expert on workplace financial education, employers who provide a “sound investment in employees, a quality financial education program would benefit your business for years to come. Workers become more tolerant of budget cuts that prevent expected increases in pay. Fewer employees work second jobs or seek higher paying jobs at the expense of their employer. Employees who are more cost-conscious at home should be more cost-conscious at work.”



In the end, this reduces absenteeism and, for the employer, that means increased profits. When a business focuses on human capital, something that has a reduced importance to employers as the worker ages, it can increase an employee’s financial capital. Their efforts may in the end be somewhat of a Sisyphean challenge. The hardest part is not in the education of employees, it is in the creation of a permanent change in attitude about a future that lies solely in their hands.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Retirement Planning and Stress

I write in the book: “money creates a layer of protection.” And as we all know, when our protection is threatened, we become anxious. That anxiousness leads to stress, and, we all know that stress can lead to health problems.

Thomas Holmes worked in a tuberculosis clinic in Seattle during the fifties. While physicians have often documented the connection between health and certain mind body situations, Dr Holmes along with Richard Rahe created a table to find out just how much stress in a person’s life was directly related to the patient’s chances of recovery from illness.



While his research was considered by many to be rudimentary and even as some researchers questioned his methods, the link that was previously only thought to exist, was now measurable. Dr. Holmes had made a notable breakthrough. According to an article published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, “Although his peers did not necessarily agree with all of his conclusions, Holmes apparently did succeed in convincing them that his work was important.”




And while “inexact terminology and their inability to consider the fact that everyone responds differently to stressful situations” made the rating scales the target of criticism, the fact remains, no matter what you call it, life events or stressful occurrences, everyday life is fraught with problems that could have an effect on not only your daily financial decision making, but the long-term attempt at retirement planning.



Critics have also pointed out that their work asked patients to look back at their lives and pinpoint various details. This, according to the scientific community creates a retrospective analysis and is not considered the best form of scientific discovery.

In retirement planning, a look back can only afford you a glimpse of how your future may be. Granted, this retrospection can be stressful in and of itself. It can point out missteps and flaws of character that Benedict Carey of the New York Times called “regret with a dash of bitters”. Mr. Carey also refers to this looking back at what might have been a “corrosive exercise”.

But retirement planning needs to begin with a determination of where you are – and that is difficult without a look at how you got there.

SCORING FOR THE HOLMES-RAHE SOCIAL READJUSTMENT SCALE


















Less than 150 life change units

=


30% chance of developing

a stress-related illness

150 - 299 life change units

=


50% chance of illness


Over 300 life change units

=

80% chance of illness
































































Life Events

Score

Death of spouse

100

Divorce

73

Marital separation from mate

65

Detention in jail, other institution

63

Death of a close family member

63

Major personal injury or illness

53

Marriage

50

Fired from work

47

Marital reconciliation

45

Retirement

45

Major change in the health or
behavior of a family member

44

Pregnancy

40

Sexual difficulties

39

Gaining a new family member
(e.g., through birth, adoption, oldster moving, etc.)

39

Major business re-adjustment
(e.g., merger, reorganization, bankruptcy)

39

Major change in financial status

38

Death of close friend

37

Change to different line of work

36

Major change in the number of
arguments with spouse

35

Taking out a mortgage or loan
for a major purchase

31

Foreclosure on a mortgage or loan

30

Major change in responsibilities at work

29

Son or daughter leaving home
(e.g., marriage, attending college)

29

Trouble with In-laws

29

Outstanding personal achievement

28

Spouse beginning or ceasing to
work outside the home

26

Beginning or ceasing formal schooling

26

Major change in living conditions

25

Revision of personal habits
(dress, manners, associations, etc.)

24

Trouble with boss

23

Major change in working hours or conditions

20

Change in residence

20

Change to a new school

20

Major change in usual type and/or
amount of recreation

19

Major change in church activities
(a lot more or less than usual)

19

Major change in social activities
(clubs, dancing, movies, visiting)

18

Taking out a mortgage or loan for a lesser
purchase (e.g., for a car, TV, freezer, etc.)

17

Major change in sleeping habits

16

Major change in the number of
family get-togethers

15

Major change in eating habits

15

Vacation

13

Christmas season

12

Minor violations of the law
(e.g., traffic tickets, etc. )

11

TOTAL

_____