One the Edge of Losing Ground: Bankruptcy

The latest employment numbers are showing a slight increase in jobs. That's small comfort for the enormous group of folks who are still unemployed.

With over ten percent of us out of work, another eight percent of us no longer bothering and an estimated twenty percent of us contemplating the possibility that we might lose everything we have worked so hard for, the subject of who owns what as we consider our options in an economy that doesn't seem to be recovering fast enough to suit most of, the question of your 401(k) as part of a bankruptcy is worth asking.

The choice of bankruptcy is always the last option. When you consider this option, you will find your assets under the control of the bankruptcy estate while your case is pending. You still own these assets. Your home is protected providing you can make the payments and if your home is worth more than your mortgage, the bankruptcy estate will exclude up to $37,500 in equity from consideration. The same applies to any equity you might have in your car.

The concept for exempting these two items is relatively straightforward. How could you possibly hope to recover from bankruptcy if you were stripped of these items? Understanding the need for shelter and transportation is important. But does the most valuable asset protecting your future fall under the same consideration?

Although you will need a bankruptcy attorney to guide you through the maze of rules, the focus of such an action is to come to some sort of agreement with your creditors on how you will repay what you owe. In some instances, it might be the forgiveness of your interest obligation in favor of satisfying the debt. Repayments plans and schedules are worked out and as long as you follow those obligations, you can remain under the roof that you own and be able to get to and from work.

The question of your 401(k) however is not so clear-cut. And the answer depends on ERISA qualifications. Section 541(c)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 541(c)(2) provides: “A restriction on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust that is enforceable under applicable law is enforceable in a case under the Bankruptcy Code.”

This means that your 401(k) is safe from the actions of bankruptcy court and cannot be considered when determining the value of the estate. If you plan falls under ERISA protection, and generally this qualification applies to most larger company plans, your assets are safe. The exception however, effects the smaller business owner.

Among the exceptions to this rule is a retirement plans that has only one participant, such as single employee corporate plans, and some other plans originating in self employment. These plans may be property of the estate. They may be vulnerable to creditors. When you consider the number of small businesses affected by the economic downturn, this is an important exemption.

For those of you who do have a plan that is exempt, the ownership of this property has found its way to the US Appeals Court. The question posed by the case dealt with the loan that was borrowed from a 401(k). Although the person was obligated to pay back the loan, the loan payment was questioned.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy subjects the estate in question to a means test. This sorts out what is qualified and what is not in terms of "necessary expenses". The loan repayment to the 401(k) was challenged. The court, ruling in the case of Egjebjerg v. Anderson found that the repayment to the 401(k) was the same as a contribution to that person's plan. In other words, if you loan money to yourself, the repayment of that loan is not considered a debt under the law.

The plan has not right to sue for repayment of the 401(k) loan but can, according to the court, offset the loan against future benefits. But the court that while Chapter 7 proceedings did not cover the individual, Chapter 13 would consider the repayment as part of the debt owed. This subtle difference is important and makes the consideration of good representation a must for anyone considering such a drastic move.

It is important to consider all of your options before subjecting your finances to estate scrutiny. And secondly, borrowing from your 401(k) is still a bad idea. In a Chapter 7 proceeding, the losses to that important linger far into the future. And while Chapter 13, often referred to as the wage-earners plan, does allow for the repayment of that loan under the court's approved structure, the loss of earnings in the retirement plan will have lingering effects long after you emerge, finances revitalized.

Paul Petillo is the Managing Editor of Target2025.com

Retirement Planning - A is for Asset Allocation

Today, we begin a look at the alphabet soup that has become investing and more importantly, retirement planning. For most people, the concept of saving is already understood, the downside effects of having debt has been completely drilled in - from every angle imaginable, and the importance of a retirement plan or planning strategy is absolutely necessary to prevent financial disaster when we hit or sixties or seventies.

A is for Asset Allocation

When there is market turmoil, one of the first things you should examine is how well you have allocated the assets in your retirement portfolio. This is no easy task.

If your 401(k) was properly allocated a year ago, before the economy slowed down, with mutual funds that were focused on growing your money and with your risk tolerance in mind, you will be fine. Fundamentally, not that much has changed.

Smart investors know they need to give their portfolios twelve months to fully utilize the plan. History has shown that with time, many of the imbalances that have a stranglehold on the markets will loosen their grip and things will return to normal.

Hold tight, time will come to the rescue.

What is asset allocation?

How those assets are positioned in your retirement portfolio however is a different matter.

In a retirement plan, asset allocation takes on a different meaning. In your portfolio, you should have basket of mutual funds that focus on different parts of the market. This method of investing protects you from swings in the market that is often specific to one group of investments. The markets rarely fail altogether.

The most recent example of this happened in early 2008 when the stocks of banks and other financial institutions began to falter. The most famous was the failure of technology stocks in 2000. Had you not allocated your assets properly, you would have felt a greater loss than the market as a whole did. Asset allocation protects you from this.

The Right Mix

In order for asset allocation to work, you need to determine two things: your age and your risk tolerance. Age is not so much a reference to how old you are but how far off in the distant or near future your retirement is.

Your risk tolerance is a reference to how much of your investments you are willing to put to the test.

If you are in your twenties, it is generally assumed that you should be the most tolerant of risk, investing in growth mutual funds and able to overcome any short-term problems.

Allocation assets becomes much more important once you reach forty, beginning to temper your risk and protect some of your assets. By age sixty, you should be investing a conservative mix of stocks and bonds.

How to get the Right Allocation

Perhaps the simplest way: invest in target funds that save for a future retirement date. These types of funds gradually change your assets over the years, essentially re-allocating for you.